Current:Home > FinanceJudge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens -VitalWealth Strategies
Judge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens
View
Date:2025-04-19 15:30:38
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge in Texas on Monday ordered a temporary pause on the Biden administration’s new protections that would allow immigrant spouses of U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The administrative stay issued by U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker comes after 16 states, led by Republican attorneys general, challenged the program Friday in a lawsuit that claimed the policy would encourage illegal immigration.
One of the states leading the challenge is Texas, which in the lawsuit claimed the state has had to pay tens of millions of dollars annually from health care to law enforcement because of immigrants living in the state without legal status.
President Joe Biden announced the program in June. The pause comes one week after DHS began accepting applications.
The order puts the program on hold for at least two weeks while the challenge continues.
“The claims are substantial and warrant closer consideration than the court has been able to afford to date,” Barker wrote.
The policy offers spouses of U.S. citizens without legal status, who meet certain criteria, a path to citizenship by applying for a green card and staying in the U.S. while undergoing the process. Traditionally, the process could include a years-long wait outside of the U.S., causing what advocates equate to “family separation.”
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately return an email seeking comment on the order.
Several families were notified of the receipt of their applications, according to attorneys advocating for eligible families who filed a motion to intervene earlier Monday.
“Texas should not be able to decide the fate of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens and their immigrant spouses without confronting their reality,” Karen Tumlin, the founder and director of Justice Action Center, said during the press conference before the order was issued.
The coalition of states accused the administration of bypassing Congress for “blatant political purposes.”
The program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
If approved, applicants have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (59)
Related
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- YouTuber Hank Green Shares His Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Cancer Diagnosis
- Vehicle-to-Grid Charging for Electric Cars Gets Lift from Major U.S. Utility
- What's closed and what's open on Juneteenth 2023
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- U.S. Venture Aims to Improve Wind Energy Forecasting and Save Billions
- Surviving long COVID three years into the pandemic
- How well does a new Alzheimer's drug work for those most at risk?
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Trump EPA’s ‘Secret Science’ Rule Would Dismiss Studies That Could Hold Clues to Covid-19
Ranking
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- WHO calls on China to share data on raccoon dog link to pandemic. Here's what we know
- What to know about xylazine, the drug authorities are calling a public safety threat
- As Ticks Spread, New Disease Risks Threaten People, Pets and Livestock
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- The Politics Of Involuntary Commitment
- EPA’s Methane Estimates for Oil and Gas Sector Under Investigation
- We're gonna have to live in fear: The fight over medical care for transgender youth
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Kourtney Kardashian announces pregnancy with sign at husband Travis Barker's concert
Fearing More Pipeline Spills, 114 Groups Demand Halt to Ohio Gas Project
How to show up for teens when big emotions arise
Travis Hunter, the 2
You asked: Can we catch a new virus from a pet? A cat-loving researcher has an answer
A veterinarian says pets have a lot to teach us about love and grief
Meet the 'glass-half-full girl' whose brain rewired after losing a hemisphere